On July 1, 2004, LG Corporation split into two holding companies to separate the manufacturing and technology-related businesses from the service and retail operations. But it was not until more recently that we saw the demerger and the division take place.
What many do not know is that LG Corp. is known as a chaebol* (family-controlled conglomerate). Within the chaebol exists many subsidiaries including LG Electronics. LG Corp began with 2 families, the Koo’s and the Huh’s. The then-known entity was called Goldstar (GS) and later became to be known as LG (Lucky Goldstar).
Today the conglomerate’s subsidiaries have been reorganized and separated between the Koo family’s LG Corp and Huh family’s GS Holdings. (Scroll to bottom of page for subsidiary hierarchies for both LG Corp and GS Holdings.)
LG which had been involved with its customers’ facets of daily living (shopping at the convenience marts, purchasing fuel at the gas stations, and shopping from the Home Shopping network) gradually transferred to GS. Because LG no longer had the casual points-of-contact and the informal relationships with customers, many thought LG as a whole had become GS.
GS had more brand exposure because of the context of their products which were predominantly things you needed for living, while LG had less contact because their products focused on technology and business.
Another reason of this mass confusion is blamed on LG’s lack of PR and brand management/marketing interest preparing for and after the demerger.
The demerger gave both companies opportunities to celebrate coming into their own. GS Holdings successfully ran TV and radio commercials, newspaper and print ads, and other promotional events to announce their arrival. Even afterwards, GS is still out there educating and informing the public of what they do, what they offer, and what its future holds for consumers. Meanwhile the bigger LG was silent as if it was business as usual. Their arrogancy and complacency was very apparent.
Based on the performance of both companies throughout this ordeal, these are the implications:
- The lesser-known GS Holdings increased brand awareness created by their post-merger PR and marketing exposure. To an extent, the GS Holdings brand equity has increased partly because of LG’s inactions.
- The heavy barrage of GS Holdings advertisements compared to the zero produced by LG was misinterpreted by the general public as well as high-ranking government officials. They had thought the LG Corp dissolved and became GS Holdings because of what they saw, read, heard and based on their assumptions.
Only after the damage was obviously apparent did LG run some TV advertisements declaring the new LG. But it was too little, too late.
*Samsung (which includes Samsung Electronics) is another Korean chaebol controlled by the Lee family.
Incidentally after the 1997 Asian financial crisis, Samsung had to be
saved by foreign investors. While foreigners own majority of the
outstanding shares, the Lee family owns a minority stake yet with full
control.

